I think that if you have a cathode chamber that uses oxigen as final aceptor of electrones you produce CO2 but if there's no oxigen then the final aceptor will mainly be the carbon molecule and the protons from the media, and therefore you produce methane and hidrogen. Anaerobic metabolism is slower and because of this many people prefer to work with aerobic cathode chambers. The problem with MFC is the cost, I think it hasnot been a good busines to use them yet as the benefits should be less than the costs.
That is my idea but your question is very good and it would be better to have a coment from an expert.
3Comment
at Wednesday, 27 May 2009 01:05by kike
at Wednesday, 27 May 2009 01:05by kike



